BOMBSHELL: A New Whistleblower Comes Forward Accusing Ukraine Whistleblower of Crime

With all the talks of whistleblowers, a new whistleblower has come forward, but not against President Trump and not about his phone call with Ukrainian President Zekensky. This time the whistleblower is accusing the original whistleblower of violating a federal law pertaining to illegal funds.

The new whistleblower filed a complaint with the Intelligence Community Inspector General against the Ukraine whistleblower claiming that he may have acted illegally in acquiring funds to the tune of more than $250 million.

How does an anonymous whistleblower raise $250 million so quickly? Something just doesn't sound right.

According to The Daily Wire,

Specifically, according to Re, the second whistleblower, in the complaint filed with the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), “may have violated federal law by indirectly soliciting more than a quarter-million dollars from mostly anonymous sources via a GoFundMe page.”

Legally, the second whistleblower complaint alleges that these indirect solicitations through a GoFundMe page constitute “gifts” in violation of both regulatory and statutory law. The complaint cites both 5 CFR 2635.203 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 208-209 as possible areas of violation. Fox News has uploaded the full complaint, which was provided courtesy of the second whistleblower’s law firm, Tully Rinckey PLLC. The law firm has not revealed the identity of the new whistleblower, though Fox News reports that “the individual is the holder of a top-secret SCI security clearance and has served in government.”

Tully Rinckey PLLC, the law firm of the new whistleblower, filed the complaint citing multiple violations.

The document issued by Tully Rinckey says,

“The most concerning allegation that my client believes is that the federal employee you [ICIG] are protecting and their attorneys apparently have strategically weaponized their alleged whistleblowing activities into a very lucrative money-making enterprise using a charity incorporated under a different name than the trade name it is using for fund-raising purposes, which would appear to my client to be a clear abuse of the federal employee’s authority and access to classified information. We are requesting you investigate whether [criminal statutes or regulations have] been violated by the federal employee you are protecting when they reportedly requested an investigation into a matter that they had no direct personal knowledge of, and on account of which they were able to obtain sizeable gifts from unknown persons because of their official duty."

 

Photo Credit: Auckland Museum